Sampling Table Krejcie And Morgan
University of minnesota duluth see all articles by this author.
Sampling table krejcie and morgan. To address the existing gap krejcie morgan 1970 came up with a table for determining sample size for a given population for easy reference. Krejcie and morgan s sample size determination table population sample 10 10 15 14 20 19 25 24 30 28 35 32 40 36 45 40 50 44 55 48 60 52 65 56 70 59 75 63 80 66 85 70 90 73 95 76 100 80 110 86 source. To simplify the process of determining the sample size for a finite population krejcie morgan 1970 came up with a table using sample size formula for finite population. Krejcie and morgan s 1970 developed the formulas for determining the sample size for categorical types of data.
Sample size table from the research. Then use a stratified random sampling technique within each sub group to select the specific individuals to be included. These formulas for determining the sample size provide identical sample sizes in cases where the researcher adjusts the tabulated value based on the size of the population which should be less than or equal to 120. Educational and psychological measurement 1970 30.
Krejcie robert v morgan daryle w in educational and psychological measurement. This formula is the one used by krejcie morgan in their 1970 article determining sample size for research activities. Table for determining sample size from a given population n s n s n s. 10 10 220 140 1200 291 15 14 230 144 1300 297 20 19 240 148 1400 302 25 24 250 152 1500 306.
Krejcie morgan formula for sample size calculation the ever increasing need for a representative statistical sample in empirical research has created the dema. Krejcie university of minnesota duluth daryle w. The ever increasing need for a representative statistical sample in empirical research has created the demand for an effective method of determining sample size. Determining sample size for research activities.
Krejcie and daryle w. Concise table of three place probabilities of the symmetric binomial cumulative distribution fo.